Interrogating genomic-scale data for squamata (lizards, snakes, and amphisbaenians) shows no support for key traditional morphological relationships
American Museum of Natural History (AMNH)¦¦Estados Unidos ; George Washington University¦¦Estados Unidos ; Lehigh University¦¦Estados Unidos ; South Australian Museum¦¦Austrália ; University of Adelaide¦¦Áustralia ; Moravian College¦¦Estados Unidos ; Australian National University (ANU)¦¦Austrália ; University of Michigan¦¦Estados Unidos ; Royal Ontario Museum¦¦Canadá ; University of Mississippi¦¦Estados Unidos ; Rutgers University¦¦Estados Unidos ; Florida State University¦¦Estados Unidos ; Universidade de São Paulo (USP)¦¦Brasil ; Sorbonne University¦¦França ; Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History
Appears in Collections:
Genomics is narrowing uncertainty in the phylogenetic structure for many amniote groups. For one of the most diverse and species-rich groups, the squamate reptiles (lizards, snakes, and amphisbaenians), an inverse correlation between the number of taxa and loci sampled still persists across all publications using DNA sequence data and reaching a consensus on the relationships among them has been highly problematic. In this study, we use high-throughput sequence data from 289 samples covering 75 families of squamates to address phylogenetic affinities, estimate divergence times, and characterize residual topological uncertainty in the presence of genome-scale data. Importantly, we address genomic support for the traditional taxonomic groupings Scleroglossa and Macrostomata using novel machine-learning techniques. We interrogate genes using various metrics inherent to these loci, including parsimony-informative sites (PIS), phylogenetic informativeness, length, gaps, number of substitutions, and site concordance to understand why certain loci fail to find previously well-supported molecular clades and how they fail to support species-tree estimates. We show that both incomplete lineage sorting and poor gene-tree estimation (due to a few undesirable gene properties, such as an insufficient number of PIS), may account for most gene and species-tree discordance. We find overwhelming signal for Toxicofera, and also show that none of the loci included in this study supports Scleroglossa or Macrostomata. We comment on the origins and diversification of Squamata throughout the Mesozoic and underscore remaining uncertainties that persist in both deeper parts of the tree (e.g., relationships between Dibamia, Gekkota, and remaining squamates; among the three toxicoferan clades Iguania, Serpentes, and Anguiformes) and within specific clades (e.g., affinities among gekkotan, pleurodont iguanians, and colubroid families)
Burbrink FT, Grazziotin FG, Pyron RA, Cundall D, Donnellan S, Irish F, et al. Interrogating genomic-scale data for squamata (lizards, snakes, and amphisbaenians) shows no support for key traditional morphological relationships. Syst. Biol.. 2020 May;69(3):502-520. doi:10.1093/sysbio/syz062.
Link to cite this reference
The access to the publications deposited in this repository respects the licenses from journals and publishers.