Validated medication deprescribing instruments for patients with palliative care needs: a systematic review

Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorCentro de Ensaios Clínicos e Farmacovigilânciapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorAndrade, Frangie Kallas dept_BR
dc.contributor.authorNunes, Raziel Prado Ignaciopt_BR
dc.contributor.authorZanetti, Maria Olívia Barbozapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorZanetti, Ariane Cristina Barbozapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorSantos, Márcia dospt_BR
dc.contributor.authorOliveira, Alan Maicon dept_BR
dc.contributor.authorCarson-Stevens, Andrewpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorPereira, Leonardo Régis Leirapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorVarallo, Fabiana Rossipt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-06T16:42:23Z-
dc.date.available2023-11-06T16:42:23Z-
dc.date.issued2023pt_BR
dc.identifier.citationAndrade FK, Nunes RPI, Zanetti MOB, Zanetti ACB, Santos M, Oliveira AM, et al. Validated medication deprescribing instruments for patients with palliative care needs: a systematic review. Farm Hosp. 2023 Sep; in presspt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.butantan.gov.br/handle/butantan/5129-
dc.description.abstractPatients with life-limiting illnesses are prone to unnecessary polypharmacy. Deprescribing tools may contribute to minimizing negative outcomes. Thus, the aims of the study were to identify validated instruments for deprescribing inappropriate medications for patients with palliative care needs and to assess the impact on clinical, humanistic, and economic outcomes. Methods A systematic review was conducted in LILACS, PUBMED, EMBASE, COCHRANE, and WEB OF SCIENCE databases (until May 2021). A manual search was performed in the references of enrolled articles. The screening, eligibility, extraction, and bias risk assessment were carried out by 2 independent researchers. Experimental and observational studies were eligible for inclusion. Results Out of the 5791 studies retrieved, after excluding duplicates (n = 1050), conducting title/abstract screening (n = 4741), and full reading (n = 41), only 1 study met the inclusion criteria. In this included study, a randomized controlled trial was conducted, which showed a high level of bias risk overall. Adults 75 years or older (n = 130) with limited life expectancy and polypharmacy were allocated to 2 groups [intervention arm (deprescribing); and control arm (usual care)]. Deprescribing was performed with the aid of the STOPPFrail tool. The mean number of inappropriate medications and monthly medication costs were significantly lower in the intervention arm. No statistically significant differences were found in terms of unscheduled hospital presentations, falls, fractures, mortality, and quality of life. Conclusions Despite the availability of several instruments to support deprescribing in patients with palliative care needs, only 1 of them has undergone validation and robust assessment for effectiveness in clinical practice. The STOPPFrail tool appears to reduce the number of inappropriate medications for older people with limited life expectancy (and probably palliative care needs) and decrease the monthly costs of pharmacotherapy. Nevertheless, the impact on patient safety and humanistic outcomes remain unclear.pt_BR
dc.language.isoEnglishpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofFarmacia Hospitalariapt_BR
dc.rightsOpen accesspt_BR
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/pt_BR
dc.titleValidated medication deprescribing instruments for patients with palliative care needs: a systematic reviewpt_BR
dc.typeArticlept_BR
dc.rights.licenseCC BY-NC-NDpt_BR
dc.contributor.external(USP) Universidade de São Paulopt_BR
dc.contributor.externalCardiff Universitypt_BR
dc.subject.keywordpalliative carept_BR
dc.subject.keywordinappropriate prescribingpt_BR
dc.subject.keywordclinical protocolspt_BR
dc.subject.keyworddeprescriptionspt_BR
dc.subject.keywordpatient safetpt_BR
dc.subject.keywordcuidados paliativospt_BR
dc.subject.keywordprescripción inadecuadapt_BR
dc.subject.keywordprotocolos clínicospt_BR
dc.subject.keyworddesprescripciónpt_BR
dc.subject.keywordseguridad del pacientept_BR
dc.relation.ispartofabbreviatedFarm Hosppt_BR
dc.identifier.citationabntin press, set. 2023pt_BR
dc.identifier.citationvancouver2023 Sep; in presspt_BR
dc.contributor.butantanZanetti, Ariane Cristina Barboza|:Outros|:Centro de Ensaios Clínicos e Farmacovigilânciapt_BR
dc.identifier.bvsccBR78.1pt_BR
dc.identifier.bvsdbIBProdpt_BR
dc.description.abstractesObjetivo Los pacientes con enfermedades terminales son propensos a la polifarmacia innecesaria. Las herramientas de desprescripción pueden contribuir a minimizar los resultados negativos. Por lo tanto, los objetivos del estudio fueron identificar instrumentos validados para la desprescripción de medicamentos inapropiados en pacientes con necesidades de cuidados paliativos y evaluar el impacto en los resultados clínicos, humanísticos y económicos. Métodos Se realizó una revisión sistemática en las bases de datos LILACS, PUBMED, EMBASE, COCHRANE y WEB OF SCIENCE (hasta mayo de 2021). Se realizó una búsqueda manual en las referencias de los artículos incluidos. La selección, elegibilidad, extracción y evaluación del riesgo de sesgo se llevaron a cabo por dos investigadores independientes. Se aceptó la inclusión de estudios observacionales y experimentales. Resultados De los 5791 estudios recuperados, después de excluir duplicados (n = 1050), realizar la selección de títulos/resúmenes (n = 4741) y la lectura completa (n = 41), solo un estudio cumplió con los criterios de inclusión. En este estudio incluido, se realizó un ensayo controlado aleatorizado, que mostró un alto nivel de riesgo de sesgo en general. A los adultos de 75 años o más (n = 130) con esperanza de vida limitada y polifarmacia se les asignaron dos grupos [grupo de intervención (desprescripción) y grupo de control (atención habitual)]. Se realizó la desprescripción con la ayuda de la herramienta STOPPFrail. El número promedio de medicamentos inapropiados y los costos mensuales de los medicamentos fueron significativamente más bajos en el grupo de intervención. No se encontraron diferencias estadísticamente significativas en términos de presentaciones hospitalarias no programadas, caídas, fracturas, mortalidad y calidad de vida. Conclusiones A pesar de la disponibilidad de varias herramientas para apoyar la deprescripción en pacientes con necesidades de cuidados paliativos, solo una de ellas ha sido validada y evaluada de manera sólida en la práctica clínica. La herramienta STOPPFrail parece reducir el número de medicamentos inapropiados en personas mayores con esperanza de vida limitada (y probable necesidades de cuidados paliativos) y disminuir los costos mensuales de la farmacoterapia. Sin embargo, el impacto en la seguridad del paciente y los resultados humanísticos aún no está claro.pt_BR
dc.description.dbindexedYespt_BR
item.fulltextCom Texto completo-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.languageiso639-1English-
item.grantfulltextopen-
crisitem.author.dept#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#-
crisitem.author.dept#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#-
crisitem.author.dept#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#-
crisitem.author.dept#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#-
crisitem.author.dept#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#-
crisitem.author.dept#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#-
crisitem.author.dept#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#-
crisitem.author.dept#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#-
crisitem.author.dept#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#-
crisitem.author.orcid#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#-
crisitem.author.orcid#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#-
crisitem.author.orcid#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#-
crisitem.author.orcid#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#-
crisitem.author.orcid#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#-
crisitem.author.orcid#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#-
crisitem.author.orcid#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#-
crisitem.author.orcid#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#-
crisitem.author.orcid#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#-
crisitem.author.parentorg#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#-
crisitem.author.parentorg#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#-
crisitem.author.parentorg#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#-
crisitem.author.parentorg#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#-
crisitem.author.parentorg#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#-
crisitem.author.parentorg#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#-
crisitem.author.parentorg#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#-
crisitem.author.parentorg#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#-
crisitem.journal.journalissn#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#-
crisitem.journal.journaleissn#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#-
Appears in Collections:Artigos


Files in This Item:

1-s2.0-S1130634323001253-main.pdf
Description:
Size: 749.66 kB
Format: Adobe PDF
View/Open
Show simple item record

This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons